Mad A. Argon :qurio:<p>When I saw more <a href="https://is-a.cat/tags/degoogle" class="mention hashtag" rel="tag">#<span>degoogle</span></a> - and other <a href="https://is-a.cat/tags/BigTech" class="mention hashtag" rel="tag">#<span>BigTech</span></a> detox guides everywhere, I started noticing one thing. It's sometimes mentioned there that users may have to slightly change their habits and this part could be difficult for some people. Or people who tried to be free but couldn't continue their normal workflows so were disappointed with alternatives and wrote about it.<br />For me it was always other way. I used programs and services in different way than expected and because of this I was not compatible with popular services. I had to fight against their default behavior to be able to use them. And I often didn't achieve what I wanted. Especially when I started using more strict <a href="https://is-a.cat/tags/privacy" class="mention hashtag" rel="tag">#<span>privacy</span></a> settings in Firefox and corporate services started to see it as "unusual activity". I couldn't use them even if I wanted. I would be probably blocked or banned anyway. <br />Maybe it didn't automatically made me compatible with alternative services - but still much more compatible, when I finally could simply do my things instead of constant fighting. Things I did (or these I avoided doing) before I became privacy paranoid I did for purely practical reasons.<br />Maybe it's a problem with outlier when everthing is designed for average, most popular use cases.</p><p><a href="https://is-a.cat/tags/web" class="mention hashtag" rel="tag">#<span>web</span></a> <a href="https://is-a.cat/tags/OnlineServices" class="mention hashtag" rel="tag">#<span>OnlineServices</span></a> <a href="https://is-a.cat/tags/corpfree" class="mention hashtag" rel="tag">#<span>corpfree</span></a></p>